President Jokowi Firm on No Social Assistance for Online Gambling Victims
Karanganyar, The Gulf Observer: President Joko Widodo (Jokowi) unequivocally stated that the government would not provide social assistance to individuals affected by online gambling. His declaration came during an inspection of irrigation water pumping in Karanganyar District.
“No aid,” the president firmly stated, reiterating that the government would not offer social assistance to families economically impacted by online gambling activities. “No aid,” he emphasized again, making the government’s stance clear.
This announcement follows recent comments by Coordinating Minister for Human Development and Culture (PMK), Muhadjir Effendy, who had indicated that his ministry was discussing a plan to provide social aid specifically to family members of those involved in online gambling, rather than the gamblers themselves.
“Note my statement in entirety. We do believe that online gambling players must face legal consequences, as they are considered criminals. What I meant by social aid here is assistance dedicated to their children, wife, or husband,” Effendy clarified on Monday, June 17, in response to public reactions on social media regarding the proposed social aid.
Minister Effendy argued that such aid could help alleviate the economic and mental stress experienced by family members affected by online gambling. He elaborated that the aid proposal was intended to complement the establishment of the Task Force for Eradicating Online Gambling.
This task force, formed on June 14 under Presidential Decree No. 21 of 2024, is chaired by Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal, and Security Affairs Hadi Tjahjanto, with Minister Effendy serving as his deputy. The task force will operate until December 31 of this year, aiming to address the pervasive issue of online gambling.
President Widodo’s firm stance underscores the government’s commitment to addressing online gambling without providing direct financial assistance to those involved, focusing instead on broader regulatory and enforcement measures.
